STC NEWSLETTER COMPETITION Judge Name: Newsletter Name: Judging and Evaluation Form Chapters and Student Chapters QUALITATIVE C: Editorial Quality Note: Send all results to laurie@stc.org. Rate each issue for editorial quality, according to the five criteria established for Category C (please see competition rules). Scale: 1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Excellent Category C: Issue Editorial Quality 1 2 3 1. Usage [ ] [ ] [ ] 2. Style [ ] [ ] [ ] 3. Craftsmanship [ ] [ ] [ ] 4. Originality [ ] [ ] [ ] 5. Overall impression [ ] [ ] [ ] Total raw score per issue: ___ ___ ___ Total Multiply by 1.5 ___ ___ ___ _____ (max. score per issue = 30) (max. total score for Category C = 90) JUDGE'S COMMENTS Good commentary is extremely important to the newsletter editors. Please divide your commentary into the two areas to the right, and provide both kinds of commentary. Send commentary as an email note or as an attached file. Provide separate commentary in both categories: Areas of Excellence Praise achievements. Be sure to include significant positive feedback as to what the newsletters are doing right. Your positive comments make up the pages of the Annual Conference and traveling exhibits. Areas for Improvement Editors often appreciate suggestions on how they can improve their newsletters. Identify areas that lowered their score. ======================= Chapters and Student Chapters QUALITATIVE D: Design and Delivery Rate each issue for design and delivery quality, according to the five criteria established for Category D (please see competition rules for specific requirements for paper and online newsletters). Scale: 1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Excellent Category D: Issue Design and Delivery 1 2 3 1. Professional presentation [ ] [ ] [ ] 2. Page design [ ] [ ] [ ] 3. Art quality and appropriateness [ ] [ ] [ ] 4. Typography [ ] [ ] [ ] 5. Delivery [ ] [ ] [ ] Total raw score per issue: ___ ___ ___ Total Multiply by 1.5 ___ ___ ___ _____ (max. score per issue = 30) (max. total score for Category D = 90) JUDGE'S COMMENTS Good commentary is extremely important to the newsletter editors. Please divide your commentary into the two areas to the right, and provide both kinds of commentary. Send commentary as an email note or as an attached file. Provide separate commentary in both categories: Areas of Excellence Praise achievements. Be sure to include significant positive feedback as to what the newsletters are doing right. Your positive comments make up the pages of the Annual Conference and traveling exhibits. Areas for Improvement Editors often appreciate suggestions on how they can improve their newsletters. Identify areas that lowered their score.