2003 Newsletter Competition Judging Newsletter Name: Judge Name: Qualitative SIGs Judging and Evaluation Form: Category C Rate each issue for editorial quality, according to the five criteria established for Category C (please see competition rules). Scale: 1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Excellent Category C: Editorial Quality Issue 1 Issue 2 Issue 3 1. Usage .................[ ] [ ] [ ] 2. Style .................[ ] [ ] [ ] 3. Craftsmanship .........[ ] [ ] [ ] 4. Originality ...........[ ] [ ] [ ] 5. Overall impression ... [ ] [ ] [ ] Total raw score per issue: ____ ____ ____ Total Multiply by 1.5 ____ ____ ____ ______ (max. score per issue = 30) (max. total score for Category C = 90) Judge's Comments Comments are optional for statistical judges. Please divide your commentary into the two areas to the right, and provide both kinds of commentary. Send commentary as an email note or as an attached file. Provide separate commentary in both categories: Areas of Excellence: Praise achievements. Be sure to include significant positive feedback as to what the newsletters are doing right. Your positive comments make up the pages of the Annual Conference and traveling exhibits. Areas for Improvement: Editors often appreciate suggestions on how they can improve their newsletters. Identify areas that lowered their score. = = = = = Qualitative SIGs Judging and Evaluation Form: Category D Rate each issue for design and delivery quality, according to the five criteria established for Category D (please see competition rules for specific requirements for paper and online newsletters). Scale: 1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Excellent Category D: Design and Delivery Issue 1 Issue 2 Issue 3 1. Professional presentation .......[ ] [ ] [ ] 2. Page design .....................[ ] [ ] [ ] 3. Art quality and appropriateness [ ] [ ] [ ] 4. Typography ......................[ ] [ ] [ ] 5. Delivery ........................[ ] [ ] [ ] Total raw score per issue: ____ ____ ____ Total Multiply by 1.5 ____ ____ ____ ______ (max. score per issue = 30) (max. total score for Category D = 90) Judge's Comments Comments are optional for statistical judges. Please divide your commentary into the two areas to the right, and provide both kinds of commentary. Send commentary as an email note or as an attached file. Provide separate commentary in both categories: Areas of Excellence: Praise achievements. Be sure to include significant positive feedback as to what the newsletters are doing right. Your positive comments make up the pages of the Annual Conference and traveling exhibits. Areas for Improvement: Editors often appreciate suggestions on how they can improve their newsletters. Identify areas that lowered their score.